Over the past weeks we have compared Kilimanjaro, honestly, one mountain at a time, with the seven great treks and climbs it shares the world's daydreams with: Everest Base Camp, the Inca Trail, Mont Blanc, Elbrus, Aconcagua, Mount Kenya and its neighbour Meru. Every one of those pieces answered the same question: this one, or that one?

This is the great dinner-table debate of world trekking, and it is really a choice between two opposite prizes. Kilimanjaro gives you a summit of your own: the highest point in Africa, under your boots, earned. Everest Base Camp gives you an audience with the king: a two-week walk through the greatest mountain range on earth to stand at the foot of the highest mountain of all.

The final comparison in this series is the closest to our hearts, because these two mountains share a horizon. Mount Meru stands barely seventy kilometres from Kilimanjaro, close enough that from Meru's summit ridge at dawn you watch the sun rise directly behind the Roof of Africa, floating on the clouds across the plain.

Africa's two greatest mountains stand a border apart, and the comparison between them is the connoisseur's favourite, because it is the only one in this series where the quieter, lower, cheaper mountain has a genuine claim to being the more beautiful.

Every comparison in this series so far has asked "which one should you do?" This one is different, because for most mountain dreamers these two peaks are not rivals, they are chapters.

Ask the internet which are the two "easiest" of the Seven Summits and it will hand you the same pair every time: Kilimanjaro and Elbrus. And that lazy label hides the truth, because these two mountains could hardly be more different.

Here is the comparison where the obvious answer is wrong. Kilimanjaro stands more than a kilometre higher than Mont Blanc, so surely it is the harder climb? No. Kilimanjaro is the highest mountain on earth you can simply walk up. Mont Blanc, a full 1,100 metres lower, is a genuine mountaineering ascent: crampons, ice axe, rope, glacier travel and real alpine judgement. Higher is not the same as harder, and choosing between these two is really choosing between two different sp

Two of the most famous walks on earth, one adventure budget, and a decision that keeps coming up at dinner tables everywhere: the Roof of Africa, or the road to Machu Picchu?

Kilimanjaro is five climates stacked on top of each other. You start warm and humid in the rainforest, cross open moorland where the sun burns and the wind bites, walk an alpine desert that swings from hot noon to freezing night, and finish in arctic conditions on summit night, well below freezing with wind on top.

There are six main ways up Kilimanjaro, and choosing between them is the single biggest decision of your climb. It shapes what you see, how busy your trail is, where you sleep, and, more than anything, your chance of standing on the summit.

The Marangu Route suits the climber who genuinely prefers a hut to a tent, who is climbing in the wetter months and wants a roof each night, or who is watching the budget. It is a reasonable choice for a first climb too, provided you take the six-day version so your body has the time it needs to adjust. If comfort and simplicity matter more to you than scenic variety, Marangu has real and lasting appeal.

The Rongai Route suits the climber who wants peace and quiet, a gentle and forgiving gradient, or a dependable option in the wetter months. It is a lovely choice for first-time climbers and for anyone who would rather ease up the mountain than tackle the steeper, busier southern routes.

Africa has two great trekking mountains. Here is how Kilimanjaro and Mount Kenya compare, and why the right answer for many people is both.